🔗 Share this article

Iran is willing to resume nuclear talks with the United States on condition that it is treated with "dignity" and "respect", Iran's foreign minister has stated.

The Iranian diplomat said only diplomacy produced results, and revealed recent overtures had come from intermediaries to restart negotiations with the American leadership. He said Iran did not have secret atomic facilities, and Tehran could not yet allow the global atomic watchdog to visit struck enrichment centers for protective measures.

Navigating a Challenging Path

Araghchi is treading a complex route since Iran does not want be perceived to be acting from a position of disadvantage, and he consistently maintained that Iran had arisen stronger defensively and psychologically from the coordinated strike on its atomic facilities in June.

He was talking at a defense forum in Tehran where he restated that Iran had "an absolute privilege to refine atomic fuel within its borders that it will never give up" – the key factor of the impasse in the previous talks.

Prior Discussions Abruptly Terminated

The earlier sessions of discussions between the US and Iran were concluded unexpectedly and bitter conclusion on 12 June when the Israeli government, with American backing, targeted Iranian nuclear sites in a fortnight-long engagement that ended with the US president claiming the locations had been obliterated. Subsequently, EU nations used their privilege to reimpose UN-wide sanctions, but Iran asserts they have not had a substantial consequence.

Magic Solution Suggested

Tehran representatives stated they felt they had achieved a "perfect agreement" to the nuclear fuel concern in prior discussions, when it was settled an domestic cooperative with US participation could enrich uranium. Both sides would have been able to claim victory since home-based processing would have persisted and the US could be confident that Iran's enrichment initiative was exclusively peaceful.

It had not been agreed in the talks that Washington's technical specialists could function inside Iran, but that was a logical implication of the cooperative offer. Diplomats asserted on multiple occasions they had reached agreement with the US representative Steve Witkoff only for the arrangement to collapse due to "detractors in America".

Current Position

Iranian officials declared the cooperative arrangement was now off the table, but it seems highly likely the suggestion could be revived in various formats if discussions reopen.

The US president recently claimed he had been obtaining communications that Iran sought to reopen negotiations, but confidentially Tehran representatives state they are not yet obtaining coherent offers from Washington either explicitly or from significant local go-betweens, such as Qatar, the Egyptian leadership, the Omani authorities and the Saudi kingdom. The Tehran's diplomatic corps has been charged of non-responsiveness in the aftermath of Washington's unmediated tactics, but Tehran asserts negotiations is not part of a show.

Political Stance

In his remarks to the gathering, aimed to paint the US as a dominant force that exploits the notion of worldwide standards, Araghchi stated the fortnight-long engagement revealed the conflict could not be settled by combat operations. He stated the assaults started with a American requirement for an complete Tehran capitulation and culminated with an unconditional call for a halt to hostilities.

Iran is convinced the opening assaults from Tel Aviv were mounted with full US knowledge and collaboration, making trust difficult to restore.

Negotiations Remains the Ultimate Resolution

Araghchi declared: "It was not Iran that had abandoned dialogue; it was America and the Western nations that had repeatedly tried to impose their desires during the negotiations. Dialogue can still be active and continues the ultimate solution to address conflicts, but its standards, rules and principles must be respected."

"If they speak to the citizens of Tehran with the language of respect and honor, they will receive a response in the equivalent tone."

Recovery and Reconstruction

In what is portrayed by Iranian officials as the battle of recovery and rebuilding, the foreign minister stated he was assured Iran's defence capabilities "are much stronger than prior to 13 or 14 June of this year. Every aspect of our defense have been rebuilt. We learned numerous insights from this war; we have come to know our own weaknesses and the weaknesses of the enemy."

He added: "We managed to survive this conflict. Our nuclear technology, which they planned to destroy, remains in place. The facilities and gear, if destroyed, will be rebuilt; what is crucial is the determination of the citizens of Tehran and then the national cohesion that they aimed at, but failed to destroy. The nation of Iran have developed more powerful, more cohesive, and more endorsing of the government and the nation in the face of this invasion."