🔗 Share this article

The Australian controversial action to restrict social platforms access for young people below 16 is creating waves internationally. Politicians, safety advocates, and families are watching with great interest to see if this strategy will become a template for other nations.

European Movement

In Europe, a rising group of countries are exploring similar restrictions.

• The Danish government has stated a prohibition on social media for children under fifteen, with the leader arguing that mobile devices and platforms are "stealing our youngsters' youth". Legislation is expected to be enacted in the coming year.
• The Norwegian government is preparing to introduce a age restriction of 15, citing the need to safeguard the young from the "influence of the AI".
• The Irish government is introducing a digital wallet to confirm the age and identity of social media participants. The media minister have suggested that an similar ban is "an measures in reserve".
• In The Spanish government, the prime minister has asked parliament to enact a bill raising the minimum age for using social media to 16.
• In The French government, the head of state has proposed a ban for under-15s, and a government panel has endorsed a similar action, including an overnight "digital curfew" for older teenagers.
• The government in The Dutch government has urged families to prevent their youngsters from social media before 15.

Across the European Union, the European parliament has adopted a symbolic motion supporting a ban for minors without a parent decides otherwise is provided. Although it warns of the "compulsive" quality of these platforms, the resolution does not create enforceable legislation.

"An effective age barrier is a useful starting point," stated the European lawmaker supporting the measure.

The UK: A Watchful Eye

Across Britain, the administration has remained open to a possible ban, arguing that "no option is off the table" but insisting any decision must be "based on strong evidence".

Last year, interest grew behind a proposal to impose controls on social media use by under-16s, but it was eventually watered down. Instead, the administration pledged to investigate the issue.

Advocacy groups have expressed concerns. A prominent charity founded by the loved ones of a teenager who died after viewing dangerous social media material contends that a strict age ban may not improve online safety and could result in a "sudden drop-off" of risk when teens become eligible.

"Australia's ban is a answer to the inability of the Silicon Valley to create products and services that are secure and age appropriate for children," stated a prominent child protection advocate.

The United States: A State-by-State Picture

In the United States, regulation is primarily occurring at the state level due to federal inaction.

• Utah requires adult approval for those under 18 to use social media and limits overnight use.
• Florida has passed a measure banning children under fourteen from creating accounts on social media, though it is subject to constitutional disputes.
• Virginia has enacted a regulation limiting teenagers to a single hour of social media time per day, with additional use requiring a guardian's okay.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have likewise introduced bills mandating adult authorization for teenagers to create social media profiles.

Despite widespread concern and calls from various politicians to copy this lead, a US-wide ban is currently seen as a distant prospect.

Worldwide Outlook

Beyond these regions, other nations are also taking action.

• The Malaysian government plans to restrict social media for those under sixteen effective next year.
• Brazil has raised the minimum age for the platform Instagram to 16.

Yet, world bodies strike a more nuanced tone. The UN children's agency has advised that age-based restrictions pose dangers and "could have unintended consequences". The agency notes that online platforms can be a "lifeline" for isolated youth and that government action should not be a "excuse" for social media firms to prioritize user protection.

While this international conversation continues, the policies of Australia and several other countries show that states around the world are increasingly content to delay for platforms to act voluntarily.